ifmvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ifm | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 370 | 24 057 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.1.2 · 20 Aug 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 49/100 for ifm, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ifm.
If you want the quickest setup, ifm is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
ifm details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep ifm, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with