HyperSwitchvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 45 517 | 117 997 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 606 | +5 638 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for HyperSwitch, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 638 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with