PanWatchvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PanWatch | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Fintech | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 281 | 118 088 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +130 | +5 729 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 729 stars in 30 days).
PanWatch details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep PanWatch, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with