HyperSwitchvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 45 510 | 41 139 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 680 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 76 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 77/100 for ToolJet, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 680 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with