HyperSwitchvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 45 516 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 686 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 39 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 686 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with