OctoBotvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 6 873 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +266 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 39 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OctoBot scores 69/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).
OctoBot details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with