HyperSwitchvsSparkyFitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | SparkyFitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 45 536 | 6 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 625 | +393 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 27 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →SparkyFitness details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with