PanWatchvsSparkyFitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PanWatch | SparkyFitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Fintech | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 283 | 6 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | +393 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 27 |
| Latest release | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for PanWatch.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+393 stars in 30 days).
PanWatch details →SparkyFitness details →
Swap a project
Keep PanWatch, compare it with
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with