HyperSwitchvsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 45 536 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 625 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →ryot details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with