PanWatchvsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PanWatch | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Fintech | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 283 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 63/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
PanWatch is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).
PanWatch details →ryot details →
Swap a project
Keep PanWatch, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with