HyperSwitchvsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 45 510 | 108 958 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 680 | +9 051 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 81/100 for HyperSwitch, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 051 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →Orca details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with