hypermindvsMularr
Two self-hosted P2P projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hypermind | Mularr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in P2P | #2 of 2 in P2P |
| GitHub stars | 843 | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 20 Jan 2026 | v1.0.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
hypermind scores 53/100 against 45/100 for Mularr, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, hypermind is easier to run; Mularr needs more configuration.
hypermind is growing faster right now (+2 stars in 30 days).
hypermind details →Mularr details →All P2P projects →