kubovsMularr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| kubo | Mularr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 2 in P2P |
| GitHub stars | 17 160 | 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.43.1 · 14 Sept 2026 | v1.0.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
kubo scores 71/100 against 45/100 for Mularr, so it is the safer default.
Mularr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for kubo.
kubo is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
kubo details →Mularr details →
Swap a project
Keep kubo, compare it with
Keep Mularr, compare it with