hostingvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Uptime-Kuma-Web-API scores 39/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
hosting details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →