avideovsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
avideo scores 58/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
avideo is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with