hostingvsskyvern
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | skyvern | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #3 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 23 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +237 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 26 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.56 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
skyvern scores 75/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
skyvern ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, skyvern is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
skyvern is growing faster right now (+237 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →skyvern details →