Hindsightvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hindsight | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 55 628 | 93 043 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 581 | +1 249 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.1.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 86/100 for Hindsight, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Hindsight.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Hindsight needs more configuration.
Hindsight is growing faster right now (+3 581 stars in 30 days).
Hindsight details →uptime-kuma details →