HiClawvsZealot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | Zealot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 209 in AI Agents | #17 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 5 890 | 1 368 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +221 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | 6.2.2 · 25 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
HiClaw scores 67/100 against 55/100 for Zealot, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Zealot.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Zealot needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+221 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →Zealot details →