HiClawvsyoutube-dl-nas
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | youtube-dl-nas | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #27 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 892 | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | 26.1029 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
HiClaw scores 67/100 against 50/100 for youtube-dl-nas, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for youtube-dl-nas.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; youtube-dl-nas needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →youtube-dl-nas details →