HiClawvsWireGuard Easy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | WireGuard Easy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 27 320 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +332 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v15.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
WireGuard Easy scores 73/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WireGuard Easy.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; WireGuard Easy needs more configuration.
HiClaw details →WireGuard Easy details →