HiClawvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 41 139 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 76 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; ToolJet needs more configuration.
HiClaw details →ToolJet details →