HiClawvsSuperset
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | Superset | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 75 345 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +444 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 25 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | superset-helm-chart-0.22.8 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Superset scores 88/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
Superset ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Superset needs more configuration.
HiClaw details →Superset details →