HiClawvsMCSManager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | MCSManager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 5 005 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MCSManager scores 68/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →MCSManager details →