HiClawvsLabTether
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | LabTether | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 234 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
HiClaw scores 67/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for LabTether.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; LabTether needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →LabTether details →