hermes-agentvsSlipshow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hermes-agent | Slipshow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 120 in AI Assistant | #11 of 38 in Personal Productivity |
| GitHub stars | 258 270 | 901 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 528 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.22.5 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.13.0 · 5 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
hermes-agent scores 89/100 against 52/100 for Slipshow, so it is the safer default.
hermes-agent ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Slipshow.
If you want the quickest setup, Slipshow is easier to run; hermes-agent needs more configuration.
hermes-agent is growing faster right now (+9 528 stars in 30 days).
hermes-agent details →Slipshow details →
Swap a project
Keep hermes-agent, compare it with
Keep Slipshow, compare it with