HealthchecksvsZigbee2MQTT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Zigbee2MQTT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 10 469 | 15 764 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Healthchecks details →Zigbee2MQTT details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Zigbee2MQTT, compare it with