HealthchecksvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with