UpptimevsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 17 183 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Markdown | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Upptime details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with