Healthchecksvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 10 469 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with