Upptimevswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 17 185 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Markdown | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
Upptime details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with