HealthchecksvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 33 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Warpgate scores 75/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with