Healthchecksvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 948 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 18 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with