HealthchecksvsThoughtDAG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | ThoughtDAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #25 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 10 472 | 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +110 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.5.26 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 51/100 for ThoughtDAG, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ThoughtDAG.
If you want the quickest setup, ThoughtDAG is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →ThoughtDAG details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep ThoughtDAG, compare it with