Healthchecksvsterrapod
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | terrapod | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #8 of 8 in DevOps |
| GitHub stars | 10 472 | 264 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +110 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 43 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.11.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 51/100 for terrapod, so it is the safer default.
terrapod ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; terrapod needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →terrapod details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep terrapod, compare it with