HealthchecksvsTechnitium DNS Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Technitium DNS Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 10 238 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +257 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v15.6.2 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Technitium DNS Server scores 77/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Technitium DNS Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Technitium DNS Server is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Technitium DNS Server is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Technitium DNS Server details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Technitium DNS Server, compare it with