HealthchecksvsSyncthing
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Syncthing | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 89 834 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +952 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 8 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.1.7 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Syncthing scores 90/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Syncthing.
If you want the quickest setup, Syncthing is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Syncthing is growing faster right now (+952 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Syncthing details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Syncthing, compare it with