HealthchecksvsSunshine
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Sunshine | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 22 in Remote Desktop |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 42 735 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +1 259 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 85 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2026.1028.25602 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Sunshine scores 84/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Sunshine ships more often: 85 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Sunshine is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Sunshine is growing faster right now (+1 259 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Sunshine details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Sunshine, compare it with