HealthchecksvsSingle Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Single Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #8 of 11 in Deployment |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 2 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Single Server.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Single Server details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Single Server, compare it with