Single ServervsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Single Server | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Deployment | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.
Single Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Single Server needs more configuration.
Single Server details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Single Server, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with