Healthchecksvsscanopy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | scanopy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 5 915 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +116 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 41 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.
scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Healthchecks details →scanopy details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep scanopy, compare it with