HealthchecksvsRomM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | RomM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 14 096 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +940 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 5.4.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
RomM scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for RomM.
RomM is growing faster right now (+940 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →RomM details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep RomM, compare it with