HealthchecksvsPulumi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Pulumi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 25 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 5 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Pulumi scores 78/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pulumi.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Pulumi details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Pulumi, compare it with