PulumivsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pulumi | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 25 825 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Pulumi scores 78/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
Pulumi ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Pulumi needs more configuration.
Pulumi is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).
Pulumi details →Upptime details →