HealthchecksvsPostal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Postal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 16 899 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 3 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 3.3.7 · 3 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 72/100 for Postal, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Postal.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Postal needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Postal details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Postal, compare it with