HealthchecksvsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 108 815 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +8 908 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 908 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Orca details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with