Healthchecksvsopenstatus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | openstatus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 7 in Status Pages |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 9 241 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 69/100 for openstatus, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openstatus.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; openstatus needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →openstatus details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep openstatus, compare it with