openstatusvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openstatus | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Status Pages | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 9 240 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +97 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
openstatus and Upptime score the same (69/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; openstatus needs more configuration.
openstatus is growing faster right now (+97 stars in 30 days).
openstatus details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep openstatus, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with