Healthchecksvsopen·kritt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | open·kritt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 2 379 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 5 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →open·kritt details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep open·kritt, compare it with