HealthchecksvsNode RED
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Node RED | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 23 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 21 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.1.17 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Node RED scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Node RED ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Node RED is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Node RED details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Node RED, compare it with