Healthchecksvslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 156 117 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +926 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 20 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
langflow is growing faster right now (+926 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →langflow details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep langflow, compare it with